The point I was making is that in the context of your post you talked about not defending other countries and that the US should come first, with which I agreed even if I was deliberately being acerbic just to tally points in an argument...which I admit to.
Look, I get that you are passionate about your refusal to accept this actions and I can accept that, because I am just as passionate in support of it because I believe when people tell you they intend to kill you, it is wise to listen, in my opinion.
That you don’t feel that way is clear to me. I don’t want this discussion to progress to the point where we actually begin to resort to ad hominem attacks.
I will let you have the last word.
” I believe when people tell you they intend to kill you, it is wise to listen, in my opinion.”
The problem is that your “two minutes of hate” is selective.
If the WH decided North Korea was the enemy of the moment would you be jumping on that bandwagon?