It's the Samson Option (Hebrew: b'rerat shimshon), referring the biblical figure.
I have a little trick that I like to use. I say something that's not quite right, and people fall all over themselves to correct me. In the process, they establish the point I was trying to make! I used it just yesterday in another thread. It works great!
Should we do something to disarm the messianic, religious state that stole nuclear material from us to build their first weapons?
No. Why would you feel any compulsion to do so? (even if all that blarney you've spouted is correct.)
We have to take into account they've betrayed us over and over, and as you note...
I've seen one example recently where their guys may have sold technology to China, but we have crooks in our army too. I don't consider what a rouge person or group does to be the policy of their government.
So I don't know what you mean about this "betrayed us" stuff.
...and as you note, they threaten the world, even total innocents, with their nuclear weapons.
After what the world has done to them, I can't say I blame them. They have innocents in their country too.
Are you onboard with starting a war with the messianic state who have nuclear weapons, and by your own admission threaten our lives with them?
Not at all. Unless they are shown to be a threat to us, I have no quarrel with Israel.
But clearly you do. It's "da joos" isn't it?
…
Are you onboard with starting a war with the messianic state who have nuclear weapons, and by your own admission threaten our lives with them?
Not at all.
So the point is we can, have, and do live with nuclear threats (e.g. Israel’s Samson Option, of which you so kindly reminded us) that don’t require us to go to war illegally.
Thanks for agreeing, even if you didn’t realize until now that’s what you were doing.
No tricks required. Just getting you to answer the questions.