Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jroehl
We could have nuked Moscow and taken over the whole world. We would have had relative peace for a thousand years. It would have eliminated the Cold War and saved millions of lives.

What about Leningrad, or Kiev, or Stalingrad, or Svastrapol, Minsk, or Vladivostok. Did we even have that many nukes in 1945? I don’t think so. And as to saving lives, how many did we kill nuking Moscow?

I’m sure as hell glad you weren’t in charge in 1945.

30 posted on 07/21/2026 8:57:24 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto

We now have several people who can kill all of humanity tomorrow morning. Not a good outcome by any measure.


31 posted on 07/21/2026 9:08:20 AM PDT by jroehl (And how we burned in the camps later - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - The Gulag Archipelago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Ditto

Patton was no fan of nuclear weapons.

“Wonder weapons?” My God, I don’t see the wonder in them. Killing without heroics. Nothing is glorified? Nothing is reaffirmed? No heroes, no cowards, no troops, no generals. Only those who are left alive and those who are left... dead. I’m glad I won’t live to see it.”


34 posted on 07/21/2026 9:13:39 AM PDT by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson