“each year we are involved in numerous investigations and cases addressing discrimination and harassment on the basis of race and national origin. For examples, view the cases list.”
“The Section’s work includes addressing discrimination and harassment on the basis of religion, and spans all religious affiliations. For examples, view the cases list.”
https://www.justice.gov/crt/types-educational-opportunities-discrimination
Which of those examples do you think buttresses your case that the federal government can deny someone opportunities as punishment for their speech?
Look at the summaries.
They’re almost all about ensuring someone has taxpayer financed access to materials in their own language, or ensuring someone doesn’t get denied this or that. I didn’t see a single one supporting the idea that the government can deny a person opportunities because of what that person has said.
Post something relevant.