Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: woodbutcher1963

How many eyewitnesses said they saw what the investigation said happened?

You don’t know that because your mind is made up (and closed) that the plane was shot down by a missile. You completely exclude any evidence to the contrary.

I have made no claim either way, you have. Prove it, using and including ALL the evidence, ALL eyewitness testimony, ALL testing of materials, months and months of detailed examination.


51 posted on 07/18/2026 5:01:26 AM PDT by Az Joe (Pope Marx I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Az Joe
I know what the police/NTSB evidence said. I also know that Clinton was running for re election. I remember all the discussion we had here on FR at the time. Which is why I discounted the US Navy accidental shooting theory. Mostly because some squid would have eventually blabbed.

The theory that it was a MAN PAD launched from a small boat off the NJ shore is much more plausible. Especially since an EL AL flight was scheduled to be in that take off position from JFK and got switched at the last minute.

In addition the voltage of the electrical system of the aircraft is designed not to be able to ignite fuel. Jet fuel does not blow up like gasoline. It has to be under pressure to ignite. Similar to diesel.

The Clinton administration did not want to go to war in the Middle East. Just like Bush and Reagan prior to them. However, after Beirut, the US Cole, Kohbar Towers, the Kenyan Embassy and other terrorist acts it would have put the whole Israeli/PLO Peace process in jeopardy. Clinton would have been forced to act. It also potentially cost him the election. Unlikely, but could have.

87 posted on 07/20/2026 6:11:49 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson