Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

Poorly written article. I am reading along just fine and the when I get here:

““The first one we found, I thought, there’s no way in the world we just found a cannonball from 190 years ago,” Kolby Lanham, the Alamo’s senior researcher and historian, said in a statement. “And then fast forward just a couple of months, and we found a second one. It’s just a huge kind of once-in-a-lifetime deal—but obviously it’s happened twice.” “

Then I confused. Which ones were Texan and with ones were Mexican? Did they find 2 the first time. And then two again. Or did they find one and then the other. Or some other combo. Very poor writing.


41 posted on 07/07/2026 7:23:24 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Revel

I think they found two, with the Texan one found later.

I wonder why they were so close to each other? How did cannonballs explode? Or were these solid balls? I wonder if a Texan picked up a Mexican cannonball and thought perhaps it could be used in his cannon? Or a Mexican dropped his after they had taken over the Alamo.


42 posted on 07/07/2026 10:13:35 PM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant - Never Fearful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson