Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: T.B. Yoits
There is no restriction of the inalienable right to keep and bear arms based on whether it is in "common use" or not.

Yeah, in a real world for grown-ups you would be right. Unfortunately, we don't live in that world.

"Common use" protects what we've got, but stifles future innovation. At least it's better than the emotion-driven arguments coming from the left, which, of course, are just cover for a Marxist dystopia.

14 posted on 07/06/2026 8:28:04 AM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Rinnwald
"Common use" protects what we've got, but stifles future innovation.

We have Justice Thomas to thank for some carefully worded opinions. I don't have the sources readily available this morning, but I would bet that Thomas was careful to word the Heller decision so as to indicate that "common use" is simply one of perhaps many criteria for qualifying an arm as not being "unusual and dangerous".

Muskets, for example, are not in common use today, but I doubt that Thomas would support banning them.

21 posted on 07/06/2026 9:40:35 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson