Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

It’s an understandable mistake to call Star Wars “science fiction.” There’s no real science in it. It’s more mystical. It’s really a fantasy adventure set in space with futuristic trappings.


15 posted on 07/02/2026 5:46:43 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BradyLS
Okay, but Science Fiction is the term we use. Plenty of it doesn't have science in it. Some authors prefer the term speculative fiction to science fiction.

I don't think Star Wars and Star Trek are more appropriately lumped in with Lord of the Rings, then stuff based on Azimov and Heinlein.

17 posted on 07/02/2026 5:52:12 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS

Couldn’t have futuristic trappings because it was set in a galaxy “a long time ago.”


23 posted on 07/02/2026 6:20:24 PM PDT by Hootowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson