Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court makes ruling on trans athletes in women's sports
foxnews.com ^ | June 30, 2026 | Jackson Thompson

Posted on 06/30/2026 7:23:51 AM PDT by V_TWIN

The Supreme Court has established a new nationwide precedent that allows states to protect women's sports.

The justices ruled in favor of West Virginia and Idaho on Thursday against trans athletes who sued to gain access to girls' sports. The states were backed by the law firm Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), while the trans athletes were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Cooley Legal.

In the highly-anticipated rulings on West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, the high court upheld state laws requiring student-athletes to compete on sports teams that correspond with their biological sex at birth rather than their gender identity.

West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey praised the court's decision in a statement to Fox News Digital.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Female athletes speaking outside the US Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Female athletes speak outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., after justices heard arguments on Jan. 13, 2026, regarding state bans on transgender athletes in women's sports. (Oliver Contreras/AFP)

"This is a monumental victory for every female athlete who has ever competed, or dreamed of competing, on a fair and safe playing field. Today's Supreme Court decision affirms what common sense and the law have long made clear: states have the right to designate sports teams based on biological sex, not gender identity. Without that delineation, Title IX is turned on its head and decades of hard-fought progress to advance female athletes is erased," McCuskey said.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: freaks; freaksversusnormals; xyxx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: KevinB

Hecox started college in 2019 and is still at Boise State, eight years later.


41 posted on 06/30/2026 11:20:36 AM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Steven Scharf

“Title IX (was probably wrongly) focused on protecting only girls.”

At the expense of boys. With Ollier v. Sweetwater (2014), the Supreme Court made it clear the way we’ve cut boys’ sport in colleges will be coming to high schools.

Once you eliminate boys’ opportunities for anything because of Ollier’s Title IX rules, boys will claim to be girls just to play because the government has destroyed boys’ opportunities, just as planned.

They won’t admit it, but Ollier will cut football, band, and everything else to push girls sport and dance teams replacing marching bands, and schools with have 300 activities for girls and 0 for boys. And when boys are forced to play as girls once Democrats pass laws, boys will be asking what has happened to their rights.


42 posted on 07/01/2026 5:53:57 AM PDT by WhiteHatBobby0701
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson