Maybe Reuters is putting out false or unverified info, could be, but its reasonable to believe that a fund and potential market of this magnitude is certainly going to attract significant capital inflows. And then again, we’re not getting any info from the administration at all on this reconstruction fund. That in itself sparks questions. As I initially stated the central issue here is transparency. A little bit of color would help to dampen questions about who stands to profit. Anytime there is a lot of money sloshing around like this it deserves some scrutiny.
Because, let me say it again, NONE OF THIS HAPPENS UNTIL WE GET THE NEXT DOCUMENT SIGNED!!!!!!!!
The MoU was just an agreement to sit down and talk about stuff, the stuff listed in the MoU.