Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What the Iran MOU Is Really All About
American Thinker ^ | 21 Jun, 2026 | Gary Gindler

Posted on 06/21/2026 5:57:04 AM PDT by MtnClimber

It’s not Israel. It’s not even Iran. Look closer to home.

At this point, everyone is familiar with the 14 points of the Memorandum of Understanding between President Trump and remnants of Iran’s power structure. The document appears to use careful, ambiguous diplomatic language, but it actually serves as a raw political instrument. To decipher its true meaning, one must strip away the mannerly phrasing and read it in the plain political lexicon — the language of power, elections, and survival.

Article 1 states that midterm elections in America will take place in November 2026.

Article 2 specifies that they will occur on November 3, 2026.

Article 3 notes that these elections are nearly four months away.

Article 4 calculates the remaining time as approximately 20 weeks.

Articles 5 through 14 continue in the same vein: They emphasize the narrowing window and the need for visible results before voters go to the polls. They manifest the importance of avoiding distractions that could shift media focus. Finally, they raised the requirement that any international agreements produce measurable domestic benefits in time for Election Day.

The document never says these things directly. Instead, it speaks of “regional de-escalation,” “energy market stabilization,” and “confidence-building measures.” Translated into the realpolitik domain, however, every clause points to one overriding objective: securing a conservative majority in Congress on November 3, 2026.

Basically, these articles make the metric explicit. To win those elections, the average price of gasoline across the United States must remain below $4 per gallon — roughly less than $1 per liter. That single number has become the administration’s key performance indicator for the next four months.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: cuckertarlson; democrats; littleyappingdogs; quckerqatarlson; tuckercarlson; tuckerqatarlson

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Miami Rebel
we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before.

*************

After we worked intensely to destroy Iran economically we turn around and immediately offer to work tirelessly to help them rebuild. I know, its supposed to incentivize them to go along with our terms for a deal but the sudden reversal is hard to overlook as its wrought with inconsistency.

BTW the specific companies involved in the $300 billion Iran reconstruction fund have not been undisclosed. Given the magnitude of the Iran reconstruction fund it would be interesting to know who stands to benefit. You know, in the interest of transparency.

21 posted on 06/21/2026 7:40:02 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Anyone who thinks beating Iran is more important than beating Democrats hasn’t been paying attention. But BOTH need to be beaten.


22 posted on 06/21/2026 7:40:41 AM PDT by Merrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

...have not been disclosed.

(sorry for the typo)


23 posted on 06/21/2026 7:41:34 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
...have not been undisclosed. I really don't think that's what you meant to say. They haven't been disclosed, though, because they don't exist. No company with a brain would invest money in Iran unless and until the regime is either changed or demonstrates that investments there are safe. All Trump did in the agreement was say that America WILL ALLOW investments to be made - if Iran can attract them. Because right now we have sanctions preventing anyone from investing even if they were interested. We have to say we'll remove those sanctions before Iran can even start asking. This isn't American taxpayer dollars, and it isn't (as others have alleged) American taxpayers insuring the investments in case Iran rips them off. Neither of those assertions are true.
24 posted on 06/21/2026 7:45:37 AM PDT by Merrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Merrick

“They haven’t been disclosed, though, because they don’t exist.”

************

Not true. More than half that sum has already been committed according to news reports. The bankrolling has already started. We have no idea who the contributing parties are.


25 posted on 06/21/2026 7:51:08 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

From sovereign nations in the Middle East - Iran’s neighbors. If you have reporting that specifically indicates international corporations or particularly American corporations (even if “undisclosed”) I particularly like to see it - and probably scoff at the “sources say” attribution. But can you please give me the source or sources you’re referring to?

And - to be clear - the statement that several sovereign nations would invest funds in redevelopment was made BEFORE this MoU even happened. The MoU language is to LET them do it.


26 posted on 06/21/2026 7:54:32 AM PDT by Merrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

My guess its coming from Iran’s Gulf neighbors in lieu of calling it tolls.


27 posted on 06/21/2026 7:55:16 AM PDT by Miami Rebel (RE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Day after the election, the bombings continue.


28 posted on 06/21/2026 7:58:20 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Merrick

Numerous news reports on this. Just Google it.

FYI the funds are coming from parties in the U.S., Gulf states, Asia, South America, and Africa.

As with most funding, this fund will likely grow considerably over time.


29 posted on 06/21/2026 7:59:45 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel
This comes from "Outlook India" - always my first go-to for credible reporting:

Companies based in the US, Gulf Arab states, Asia, South America and Africa have reportedly agreed to commit financing across energy, logistics, manufacturing and transport, with firms from South Korea, Japan, Singapore and Malaysia among those named.

And they've got that solid, "reportedly agreed" right in there - that's what I call an unimpeachable source.

Seriously, though, have we got a credible source and on the record? Because I might take the assertion seriously if that were the case.
30 posted on 06/21/2026 8:00:19 AM PDT by Merrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Yeah - I did the same thing you did - and the the source was “Outlook India.”

Do you just trust what comes out of Google at face value?


31 posted on 06/21/2026 8:01:15 AM PDT by Merrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Merrick

I mean, did you notice your text and mine are IDENTICAL - but I gave the source?


32 posted on 06/21/2026 8:01:50 AM PDT by Merrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Merrick

You do know, right, that India has been buying Iranian oil on the black market at a fraction of open market value (just like China) and wants to tank this deal to keep getting cheap oil?

If you don’t know the motivations of your sources then you are just their mouthpiece.


33 posted on 06/21/2026 8:04:51 AM PDT by Merrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Americans love a victory. We generally stopped fighting after the first week of April. I think we should’ve softened them up some more before attempting any agreement. So we’ve already lost 2 months, now they get another.


34 posted on 06/21/2026 8:06:57 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I agree. This deal is all about trying to get the price of gas down early enough to have an impact on the election.

Whether it works remains to be seen.


35 posted on 06/21/2026 8:07:25 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Merrick

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/iran-deal-includes-300-billion-fund-more-than-half-which-already-committed-2026-06-16/


36 posted on 06/21/2026 8:09:41 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Iran would like to see the DemocRATs win. I expect them to disrupt oil shipments and blame Trump.


37 posted on 06/21/2026 8:18:37 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Liz

The war was never about bankrupting Iran or stealing its wealth. Nor regime change, except as a tactic for accomplishing the actual goal of ending their nuclear weapon ambitions and their support of terror.

A glut of oil will soon hit the market (plus Venezuela) and the American people will know the war is over and who won.


38 posted on 06/21/2026 8:29:08 AM PDT by bigbob (We are all Charlie Kirk now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

No question about that!


39 posted on 06/21/2026 8:59:19 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

A MOU is not a deal.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I understand, but in light of the situation and the history of Iran and Islam an MOU is an embarrassing attempt to try to save face as we retreat, if not surrender.

I just hope Trump hasn’t gone wobbly and this is a place holder to resume ending the Iranian regime after the elections. Because right now the only winners are the mullahs and IRGC.


40 posted on 06/21/2026 9:04:45 AM PDT by chickenlips (Neuter your politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson