First of all, this is a Federal case, and, believe it or not, they have more than a few things they are working on. Second, good cases that don’t fall apart after indictment take time to build. Third, it isn’t just her - there are many if not dozens of serious criminals joined with her at the hip, and you want to chase down as many leads as you possibly can to cast as wide a net as you possibly can when you go to the Grand Jury. Why indict one or two when you can indict 20 or 30?
Plus, if you indict that many, you get a lot turning state’s witness making the convictions even easier.
Don’t forget, Walz and Ellison are tied up in this, and each of them has dozens more tied to their hips. This is a BIG case.
Great points about casting a wide net. The problem is, is that she is probably destroying evidence on a daily basis. If not her, her husband, oops, I mean brother.
First of all, this is a Federal case, and, believe it or not, they have more than a few things they are working on. Second, good cases that don’t fall apart after indictment take time to build. Third, it isn’t just her - there are many if not dozens of serious criminals joined with her at the hip, and you want to chase down as many leads as you possibly can to cast as wide a net as you possibly can when you go to the Grand Jury. Why indict one or two when you can indict 20 or 30?
Plus, if you indict that many, you get a lot turning state’s witness making the convictions even easier.