I had to stop here. The feminists had a lot of help from men who, when faced with the prospect of losing a chance at some action, caved in to their agenda.
When the feminists remodeled the school system so that girls could hit or kick boys for any or no reason and didn't protect the boys or allow them to protect themselves, how did the boys' fathers respond? "Don't you ever hit a girl for any reason." Nobody wants anyone to hit anyone, but it never occurred to fathers that they should defend their sons against this open bias. Yet many of those same fathers will complain about the openly rigged system when they get dragged into family court.
Think about it. Did any of your fathers defend you from this?
The problem is that men don't care until it happens to them. That's the difference between them and other groups, in that other groups see injustice against one of them as injustice against all of them. They will unite when they think, right or wrong, that their rights are being violated.
I've had to deal with the justice system enough to know that, when a man and a women are involved, the male police officers and judges will make any excuse they can find to side with the women.
Why? Because men are naturally protective of women? Tell that to the trafficked women who are drugged up and forced to allow men to rape them so their captives can make billions off of them.
If men are so protective of women, then why are strip bars and pornographers making billions from men in an in an industry that openly exploits and abuses vulnerable women? Why are date rape drugs a thing?
Here's a clue, men. Women don't want you to protect them. They want you to stop being the thing they need protection from.
Of course that brings up the issue that women commit violent crimes against men too. That's true, but who is it that treats it like a joke, when it happens to other men?
For decades men have spent billions of dollars on strip bars, porn, and prostitution, and next to nothing fighting for their rights. With priorities like that, is it any wonder the entire system is biased against men?
Openly exploits?
Abuses vulnerable women?
In reference to the recent death of the creator of the only pornography site 'OnlyFans':
"Rest in peace to the man whose work challenged a common lie and assumption about women being forced into the porn industry. His creation proves that when given the choice and opportunity, many women will choose to enter the prostitution industry voluntarily despite having no barriers to education or voting and in many cases enjoying more rights and privileges than men. And they are mostly supported by other women who frame these choices as freedom and sexual liberation."
- @Cr7Godbrand on X
Misogynist: Someone who hates women as much as they hate each other.
No one, absolutely no one, hates women as much as they hate each other.
And the statistics for domestic violence show that lesbian couples have the highest rates of assaults on either partner, way more than heterosexual couples, while the lowest rates of assaults are among gay male pairs.
"When I opened the refuge in 1971, I knew from the beginning that it wasn’t just men. Of the first 100 women, 62 were as violent as the men they had left." - Erin Pizzey 'An invisible hero for invisible victims: interview with domestic violence pioneer, Erin Pizzey'
Pizzey became involved in running a refuge in New Mexico, as well as dealing with sexual abusers and paedophiles. Pizzey said of this work, "I discovered that there were just as many women paedophiles as there were men. Women go undetected, as usual."
Further,
The feminists had a lot of help from men who, when faced with the prospect of losing a chance at some action, caved in to their agenda. When the feminists remodeled the school system so that girls could hit or kick boys for any or no reason and didn't protect the boys or allow them to protect themselves, how did the boys' fathers respond? [...] Yet many of those same fathers will complain about the openly rigged system when they get dragged into family court. [...] The problem is that men don't care until it happens to them.
Sadly, these men (fathers) were simply deceived - see the "Boiling Frog" / "Camel's Nose in the Tent" paradigms.
The first, few, modest demands didn't seem all that unreasonable - and/or those men didn't realize how drastically they'd be implemented.
The phenomenon of "Unintended Consequences" was at play here.
Yes, some men "caved" in order to get "action." In fact, I'd go so far as to say that, in the early days of the Hippie Movement, young American men enjoyed a temporary demographic advantage: The "Baby Boom" had already crescendoed, meaning that your typical randy young man found a roughly equal no. of eligible females in his age-cohort - But an even greater no. of slightly younger females. This temporarily disrupted assortative mating: The young men had an abundance of potential mates; since women still tended to prefer somewhat older (2-5 years) men, those men (in their early / mid-20s) had tremendous leverage (in game theory, even slight advantages favoring one side can have a major impact on negotiations; this applies also to Sexual Marketplace dynamics).
My personal theory is that the "Free Love" movement in all its variations can be attributed, ultimately, to that, and that "The Pill," alone, couldn't have otherwise done it (i.e., totally disrupted traditional assortative mating).
"The Pill" was a necessary-but-not-sufficient precondition for the melt-down of morals and the concomitant collapse of traditional courtship patterns. The demographic effect likewise wouldn't have been enough on its own; it may have been merely "contributory" or "amplifying." But together...
Regards,