To: GingisK
I already have , and you ignored them and then claimed I gave none, standard prog/troll procedure.
They were all relevant verses, you just sent that cuz it proves you wrong.
You are what other relevant scriptures call
” willfully ignorant” who “ loved the lie “.
86 posted on
05/10/2026 2:53:45 PM PDT by
cuz1961
To: cuz1961
I read those verses, and I have seen them before. You think they refer to ET, I don't. There are about 600 Christian denominations simply because we interpret Scripture defferently. Have you considered that is isn't very Christian of you to call me a prog/troll for expressing my actual Christian beliefs?
If you insist that those verses refer to ET, kindly tell me how that can possibly be rather than attacking me. Truly, I don't think the context of those verses permit your very loose interpretations.
88 posted on
05/10/2026 2:59:10 PM PDT by
GingisK
To: cuz1961
Ah. I see. You think that the Biblical accounts of Fallen Angels and Nephilim are accounts of ETs. There is no reason for you to draw that conclusion. It is like assuming that people from the Philippines are Nephilim because the Bible didn't tell us in advance that we'd eventually discover the Philippine Islands. The folks in Micronesia though American service men were Gods because we came to them in airplanes.
You are drawing conclusions in cases where there is absolutely no evidence to support them. The "unknown" is not automatically "evil".
90 posted on
05/10/2026 3:05:57 PM PDT by
GingisK
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson