Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red6

There are plenty of people like me, who have been interested in history and began reading books containing factual historical accounts as kids, and continue to study it. We are not concerned with or influenced by the reinterpretation of history by pop culture. We know that historical fact is not the stuff in fantasy novels and action movies set in an era of history a couple of 1000 years ago...

That goes for psuedo science, too-anyone who took basic biology in HS knows that genetics do not have anything with homosexuality, gender confusion, etc, nor has it ever. That is a product of parenting and the resulting emotional issues-nurture-not nature, perpetuated by those in society who use the mentally confused/ill for their own purposes...

The idea that female Japanese warriors were common is not promoted by the article-it is doing the opposite-relying on historical fact-and illustrations-to say that although they did exist, they were not a huge group, charging into battle, but rather something of a rare thing, and deferring to males in their family...


36 posted on 05/07/2026 2:15:57 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Texan5; M Kehoe

“There are plenty of people like me, who have been interested in history and began reading books containing factual historical accounts as kids, and continue to study it. We are not concerned with or influenced by the reinterpretation of history by pop culture. We know that historical fact is not the stuff in fantasy novels and action movies set in an era of history a couple of 1000 years ago...”

That goes for pseudo science, too-anyone who took basic biology in HS knows that genetics do not have anything with homosexuality, gender confusion, etc, nor has it ever. That is a product of parenting and the resulting emotional issues-nurture-not nature, perpetuated by those in society who use the mentally confused/ill for their own purposes...

The idea that female Japanese warriors were common is not promoted by the article-it is doing the opposite-relying on historical fact-and illustrations-to say that although they did exist, they were not a huge group, charging into battle, but rather something of a rare thing, and deferring to males in their family...

Well said and bears repeating, as I just did above.


37 posted on 05/09/2026 9:02:42 PM PDT by flaglady47 (Trump cannot be Trumped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson