To: simpson96
If she were to run against Rubio or Vance, she’d be slaughtered.
2 posted on
05/06/2026 3:53:57 PM PDT by
fidelis
(Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
To: fidelis
Many voters aren't sentient. They are indoctrinated to do as they are told.
If they are told to vote for Kamala, they will do so (if they can find their way to the voting booth).
To: fidelis
Both Rubio and Vance are very articulate and capable speakers. Both are great in hostile interviews. Both would destroy Harris in debates. I see Rubio having more depth and knowledge, and that has shown throughout his time as Sec State. Either should do well against Harris.
17 posted on
05/06/2026 4:17:01 PM PDT by
ETCM
(“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
To: fidelis
If she were to run against Rubio or Vance, she’d be slaughtered. I wish that could be uttered with some confidence. American voters have become frightfully stupid.
71 posted on
05/07/2026 6:00:41 AM PDT by
GingisK
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson