Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

We need to at least triple our rate of production of nuclear submarines. Our fleet is aging and the current delivery schedule will not even allow us to replace existing submarines as they reach retirement.

This is one of the biggest national security challenges we have right now.


15 posted on 05/05/2026 1:19:19 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FLT-bird

“We need to at least triple our rate of production of nuclear submarines. Our fleet is aging and the current delivery schedule will not even allow us to replace existing submarines as they reach retirement.”

You do realize each missile on board has more than one warhead per each missile? Also, not all of one class of boat entered service on the same day and we have refueled boats. I have no current knowledge of where each boat reaches its expiration date,I’m operating off the boat I served on. Hurrying crap gets people killed. Subsafe and Level One control has a definite benefit to crew safety. We can stretch retire dates if necessary to meet our goals. We have so far. I agree the sooner the better but no cutting corners. Thresher is the example of crap. IMFO


17 posted on 05/05/2026 2:48:28 AM PDT by Equine1952 (MM1SS SASOBe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: FLT-bird

There’s a gap that formed between the US industrial capacity and our military procurement goals. I don’t know when it began (my guess would be in the early 90’s when off-shoring took off). All military programs are suffering delays. No program is immune. It took 30 years to get into this mess and it will take a long time to get out of it.


21 posted on 05/05/2026 6:39:51 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson