Posted on 05/02/2026 5:28:27 AM PDT by MtnClimber
For decades, the mental health industry and its allies in media, government, and education have operated on a simple assumption: the more mental health awareness we spread, through campaigns, school programs, social media, and public service announcements, the better. Raise awareness, reduce stigma, encourage help-seeking, and mental health will surely improve.
New evidence shows the opposite is happening. Well-intentioned awareness efforts are actively backfiring, manufacturing distress, inflating diagnoses, and turning normal human emotions into chronic “disorders.” The shocking result is that these campaigns are turning mentally fit people into self-diagnosed mentally ill patients, with symptoms effectively “contracted” from the awareness messages themselves.
A major new review in Nature Reviews Psychology (March 2026) confirms what many conservatives have long suspected: well-meaning mental health awareness efforts can harm more than they help. Titled “The psychological consequences of mental health awareness efforts,” the paper, led by Oxford psychologist Lucy Foulkes, synthesizes experimental evidence showing these campaigns lower the bar for what counts as a “disorder,” train people to pathologize normal emotions, and lock in self-fulfilling “illness identities.”
The authors aren’t anti-awareness radicals: they acknowledge real benefits from such campaigns, such as reduced stigma in some cases and modest increases in help-seeking. Nonetheless, the actual data on harms is damning and growing.
Three Mechanisms of Harm
The review identifies three converging pathways, drawn from previously disparate literatures on concept creep, nocebo effects, prevalence inflation, and illness self-labeling:
1. Lowering the threshold for disorder.
Awareness materials serve to broaden definitions of mental illness. Normal feelings, such as loneliness, stress, and sadness, get “reframed” as pathology. Experiments show people exposed to awareness content are far more likely to self-diagnose with conditions they simply don’t clinically meet.
2. Symptom-scanning and reinterpretation.
Campaigns teach hypervigilance, demanding that you constantly assess your inner life.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
..”Doctors are the biggest drug pushers in the US.”
Mine isn’t, in fact he prescribes nutritional supplements if WebMD says they help.
BUT then I was hospitalized with fall-in-the-floor Vertigo. Docs there decided I needed a pile of other pills, so now I allegedly take them too. The only one that may have value is Atorvastatin for cholesterol. Mine tested fine for decades, but suddenly does not now. No change in diet except that salty hospital food—they need to stop putting salt in it.
I tossed my salt shaker years ago.
These guys are not your usual mainstream doctors when it comes to meds.
We’re DOCTORS: 8 Common Medicines SCARE US
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttZcEPorVsI
Dr Dhand is a hospitalist, and Dr. Chiotellis is a cardiologist. These guys a big on eating right and lifestyle changes to optimize health and avoid medicines.
Is the CoVID ‘protein spike’ the culprit? No mention in media, ever. We know it transfers between the ‘vaccinated’ and the ‘purebloods’ with respect to transmission. We know it has a DNA component with conflicting DNA sources, setting up inflammation in the victims. Being nanoscopic in size, it easily transfers from ears, nose, etc. to new victims, even those who never took an mRNA prodluct.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.