Nice job on the skip HTML.
I've talked with some who believe that the number of illegals is much higher than that stated by the Trump administration, and that time has proven these illegals simply won't be leaving the United States.
I found that puzzling because if you remove food, water, shelter, and all the Democrat funding via countless fraud (e.g., USAID etc.), people cannot live without essentials, and can be rounded up for deportation flights more easily.
Looking at the fact that deportations have been tracking lower than expected, I began thinking about how illegals could remain without EBT, free housing and medical care and all the gifts the Dems steal from US citizens to provide for their ad hoc 'army.'
I believe the Dem 'army' of illegals is likely living off of cash to avoid tracing and deportation. But where is the money coming from? Trump has 'closed the endless wallet' on so many Dem thefts from the treasury.
The first alternative that came to mind related to Vice President Vance's recent assignment to track down fraud.
I asked Grok if the recent exposures of fraud in Somali daycare or fake medical establishments are the result of previously concealed failures of states overseeing federal funds (there are no coincidences).
Grok's reply confirmed that "shortcomings in state-level oversight and administration of federally funded programs" is currently the focus of investigation and that that VP Vance is tasked with eliminating this specific type of fraud. In my opinion, Vance is taking point in eliminating key sources of provisioning for the Dem illegal 'army' (fraud, Somali Daycare, fake medical services etc.) which persisted even after known funding streams (e.g., SNAP, free hotel housing etc.) were removed.
As food, shelter and medical services are reduced, so shall the 'stubborn' remaining population of illegals decrease and I think such decreases may exceed original expectations.
Assuming that 10 million illegals remain at the moment, demographics indicate that they are not all 'males of fighting age'. The peak entry for males of fighting age was from 2021-2025 (Thanks a bunch, Democrats!) and that this group has been the focus of the 'NICE' agents.
Some illegals are families and individuals who have been in the US long-term (e.g., parents brought them here). I'm aware of a family scheduled to be deported in the 1990's which retained lawyers to resist deportation because were they been returned to their point of origin (the poorest region in the poorest state of Mexico), the couple, in their 30's, would not be eligible for any employment, and their children would not receive specialized medication their sick child. Deciding to come to the US illegally triggers unexpected consequences. Some families are resisting the consequences of their illegal crossing years ago for non-malevolent reasons.
But I do wonder if there is pressure on, or incentives for, families or 'non combatant' illegals to remain in order to provide a veil or mask for the foreign fighters the Democrats imported. Perhaps they, along with males of fighting age, are promised the equivalent of a 'mule and 40 acres' along with citizenship if only they remain and endure.
Perhaps these families are (informally) told they will be subject to abuse if they return home as 'rich' semi-Americans. Perhaps propaganda warns them against 'wasting' the opportunities given them or (lies) about having to repay funds if they return to their country of origin.
During the Battle of Basra during the 2003 invasion of Iraq (MarchâÂÂApril 2003), some of the women fleeing Basra ahead of the US invasion were shot and thrown from a bridge in view of cameras to prevent the departure of non-combatants from leaving only the legitimate targets of military action (their army) in the city. I wonder if this type of pressure is informally in play for those who are not military but are not taking heed of incentives or warnings to leave. Are some non-combatants 'warned' not to leave lest bad things happen to them or their families upon return? Incentives or warnings to remain could be used to provide 'human shields' to cover the presence of the illegals hoping to serve Dem 'armies' which would otherwise be left exposed to capture/defeat.
Illegals the Dems imported will be removed at more rapid levels when sources of continuing, likely cash, support are removed.As this post is long enough already, I'll put my Part 2 to this post downthread after one or two more unrelated posts.
ÃÂ