[bitt]

@AnnieLala17

🚨 NEW: Active CIA employee James Erdman testifies in the Senate that in August 2021, the intelligence community was prepared to determine that the COVID-19 pandemic likely began as a leak from a Chinese lab, but days later, that changed after Dr. Anthony Fauci “injected himself” into conversations and “significantly influenced” them.

The CIA is throwing a fit because one of their own is testifying under oath about how the COVID virus likely came from a Wuhan lab — and how parts of our own government may have helped cover it up for years.

They admitted the lab leak was probably real… but now they’re mad Americans are finally hearing the full story? Millions of lives lost, businesses destroyed, kids masked and isolated, and trillions spent.

This wasn’t just a ‘mistake’ — if they lied and covered for China, that’s treason-level stuff. The American people deserve the truth, not more political theater protecting the agencies that failed us. Wake up the normies! 😂✅🍿

[bitt]

🚨 JUST IN: CIA whistleblower testifies under oath that Dr. Anthony Fauci was DIRECTLY INVOLVED in covering up the origins of COVID-19

The lab leak conclusions were WITHHELD from Congress

Fauci needs to face legal consequences! No more delays!

“Dr. Fauci’s role in the cover-up was intentional. Dr. Fauci influenced the analytical process and findings by leveraging his position to ensure the IC consulted with a conflicted list of curated subject matter experts, public health officials, and scientists.”

“Intentional or not, the IC’s actions resulted in a cover-up, wasted resources, and a failure to properly inform policymakers.”

“Public health policy would have been very different had the American public been made aware that a virus from a lab in China was going to serve as the foundation for an emergency use authorization mRNA products being mandated by the former administration.”

4 MIN VIDEO

https://truthsocial.com/@ShawnQWhiteRabbit/116568029811638390

[foldspace]

Erdman’s Senate Bombshells

CIA Whistleblower Exposes COVID Origins Cover-Up

Erdman’s Senate Bombshells on Suppression and Fauci’s Role

Concise Timeline of Erdman’s Key Statements from his May 13, 2026 Senate testimony

Early Assessments (2020–2021):
CIA analysts and scientists repeatedly leaned toward a Wuhan lab leak as the most likely origin. In one review, analysts voted strongly (e.g., 5-1 or 6-1 majorities among subject matter experts) for lab origin.

Aug 12, 2021:
CIA was preparing to publicly assess/call it a lab leak.

Aug 17, 2021 (5 days later):
Assessment flipped/changed to neutrality or inability to determine precisely. Erdman’s team could not get clear explanation from CIA on why; documents withheld.

Fauci/Expert Influence:
Fauci injected himself into the IC process, providing a curated list of conflicted/public health experts (many with ties favoring natural origin, linked to Proximal Origin-style efforts and funding). IC leadership followed these recommendations, shaping consultations and downplaying lab leak.

Report Rewrites & Leadership Override:
Draft reports favoring lab leak (e.g., 8/10 or 6/7 experts) were sent back for “redo” with new info that didn’t change conclusions. Final versions altered to neutral/uncertain. Leadership and senior analysts suppressed/downplayed lab incident possibility.

Employee/ Analyst Suppression, Discipline, Retaliation:
Dissenting analysts faced retaliation, punishment, or pressure. Erdman refuted outright “bribes” (e.g., 2023 claims of payoffs) but noted bonuses occurred; overall environment discouraged truth-telling. Protections for IC whistleblowers deemed insufficient.

Broader COVID Truth Suppression (Inter-Agency/Government/Industry/Scientists/China):
●Intentional or not, IC actions resulted in a cover-up, wasting resources and failing to inform policymakers/Congress/public.
●Cross-pollination/conflicts: Scientists funded by government (e.g., via NIH) consulted as “independent” experts.
●Eagerness to excuse China; possible anti-Trump bias played a role.
●Suppressed evidence shaped public narrative, affecting health policy (e.g., EUA for mRNA products would have differed if lab origin known).
●CIA resisted full compliance/declassification.

Other Relevant Testimony:
Erdman led a DIGS (or similar) review for ODNI; testified under subpoena as active CIA officer after classified sessions. Emphasized national security implications, need for accountability/teeth in oversight, and that this was not mere incompetence but systemic dysfunction enabling suppression.

All Erdman Responses/Statements on Fauci (Compiled)
Erdman stated Dr. Fauci’s role in the cover-up was intentional. Fauci influenced the analytical process and findings by leveraging his position to ensure the Intelligence Community consulted a conflicted list of curated subject matter experts, public health officials, and scientists (many with prior biases/funding ties against lab leak). This shaped the 2021 IC report away from lab origin. Public health policy (including mRNA mandates/EUA) would have been very different if the American public knew a lab-origin virus from China was involved. Fauci’s input helped override analyst conclusions favoring lab leak.

This is based on contemporaneous reporting from the May 13, 2026 hearing; full official transcript may provide additional verbatim details.

[Freee-dame]

“ As the CIA has already assessed, COVID-19 most likely originated from a lab leak, and efforts to undermine that conclusion are disingenuous.””

This statement from the CIA makes absolutely no sense. Is it CIA trying to CYA? The whistleblower is stating that there was a conspiracy to hide the above fact from the American people.