Why would I disagree with this?
Maybe there are individual things in it that I didn’t fully recognize, but he talks about how Indians were not “subject to the jurisdiction therof” of the U.S. and therefore the 14th didn’t apply to them.
What am I missing, what is your hook? If you would like to discuss further this Imprimus let me know.
This seems to me like this Imprimus will just be another item you abandon like how you abandoned Raoul Berger’s book “Government by Judiciary” after you discovered that the book advocated for 14thoriginalism.
I addressed it to woodpusher, and I just added you as a ping.