Posted on 04/26/2026 7:48:02 AM PDT by bill andersen
Cole Allen will be indicted on multiple charges. His alleged crimes occurred in Washington D.C. and he will be tried there. He will be found not guilty there, by reason of Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Washington D.C. is the most Trump-hating place on earth. It, along with the surrounding communities in Virginia and Maryland currently have an unemployment rate of 6.9 percent, largely due to doge cuts under the Trump administration. Prosecutors must realize the entire jury pool is tainted with anti Trump folks and they will not find impartial jurors. Even worse, the judge will be anti Trump.
It is imperative that Jeanine Pirro get this trial moved out of the area, maybe to downstate Virginia, like Norfolk. Also, if Cole Allen drove from California to Washington D.C. he crossed many jurisdictions where he could be indicted for carrying weapons used to commit crimes. He should be tried in these jurisdictions also. If he drove through Missouri for example, a federal prosecutor might be able to prosecute him there.
The perp and the judge will both have TDS. So there is that.
Crickey, here you are again. I responded on a different thread where you denounced Blanche for being worthless. I’ll ask more concisely here: in 24 days in office as Acting AG, what has he done or not done so that he has earned that moniker from you?
I’m not here to carry water for Blanche or anyone else, but, honestly, there are so many on this forum who toss this type of rhetoric around pretty loosely
They can just make up something. Like "unreasonable search and seizure". It doesn't need to make any sense. Everything depends on the venue.
We live under a pretense of law. No DC Court will convict Cole Allen of anything more serious than littering.
They need to get the trial moved out of the District of Corruption. The “judges” there are very low I.Q.
Well turn about is. Fair. Cite all those bias judges and jurors when a Republican is on trial. Legal bias is a predisposition or lack of impartiality that prevents a judge or juror from deciding a case fairly and based solely on the evidence.
The impact of legal bias is catastrophic; if proven, it can lead to a judge’s removal from a case, a new trial, or the overturning of a verdict, as it violates the fundamental right to due process.
Not necessarily dismiss out right but possibility. I didn’t have a specific one in mind as my point was more that a technicality could be used by the defense to lower charges or dismissed them.
They need to get the trial moved out of the District of Corruption.
They need to get the trial moved out of the District of Corruption.
In the same district, grandparents of potential jurors found Hinkley not guilty of shooting Reagan.
At most Cole Allen will be in prison until the next Democrat President commutes his sentence. But it is entirely possible that a D.C. jury will find him innocent, or only find him guilty on lesser charges resulting in a few years in prison. After he’s released he can run for Congress from Torrance, California.
This POS admmited he snuck the guns on a train from California to DC. Can he be charged in any state that the train passed through even if just for illegal transport of guns? Plenty of red states along both major train routes to DC.
Assuming the LEO that was saved by his bullet proof vest wasn’t hit by friendly fire, maybe that is how you try this case. Distance the name Trump from the charges, and the minds of the low IQ, racists DC jurists. Go for the attempted murder of a Law Enforcement officer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.