[faithhopecharity]

the court is supposed to interpret the constitution as it is worded
/...”domiciled” is not a word in the germane constitutional clause

No “birthright citizenship” ...

The result would be quite clear if the court were to just look at the constitution and not side-track into sophistry over words that are not part of the constitution.

“To rule, you must first change the rules.” Orwell

[DiogenesLamp]

The result would be quite clear if the court were to just look at the constitution and not side-track into sophistry over words that are not part of the constitution.

AR-15 isn't in the constitution. Neither is .357 magnum. Perhaps words that are not actually in the constitution are inherent because they fall under the umbrella of a larger intent?

"It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood.”

James Madison