Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
I can see the “domicile” or even “reside in” argument excluding those with a temporary visa.

And if they are excluded, then anyone with no visa at all must also be excluded.

-PJ

112 posted on 04/20/2026 6:08:02 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

Well sure. Like I said, I’d come down on the side of the 14th Amendment not granting citizenship to the children of illegals. Just not sure the Court will come out that way because it depends on that whole reside in/domicile thing. I think it is correct, but I get why others don’t.


113 posted on 04/20/2026 6:14:50 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson