Replies

My neighbor tells me that the bullet doesn't match the gun.

The slug was deformed when it hit bone and so the bullet spirals can't be matched with the bore spirals in the 30-06, which is to be expected.

Anyone that has a passing knowledge of ballistics is not surprised, but the prosecution does not need this as proof of guilt for that fag bastard that shot and killed the Charlie Kirk.

There is so much provable evidence, that the bullet fragments are not even considered as relevant by the prosecutor.

Give him the death penalty, and I will volunteer to shoot that murderer {first in the scrotum, next in the knee, next in the elbow, and an hour later, in the head}

Too brutal? Sorry, it is my version of justice, really hurt the fag bastard.

The slug was deformed when it hit bone and so the bullet spirals can't be matched with the bore spirals in the 30-06, which is to be expected. Anyone that has a passing knowledge of ballistics is not surprised, but the prosecution does not need this as proof of guilt... There is so much provable evidence, that the bullet fragments are not even considered as relevant by the prosecutor.

It all depends on the jury's perceptions. I am still seething about the OJ Simpson defense "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit" because no one explained to the jury that leather shrinks and contracts quite noticeably if it becomes wet, either with blood or being left out in the damp. To wear the glove again at full size, you have to stretch it patiently from side to side and top to bottom to return its original size. None of that was explained, and it sounded like that info was not even known by the prosecution.

So I certainly hope the ballistics info about the shattering of the round that hit bone is explained very, very thoroughly to the jury. The chances of a jury of actual peers not having heard any rumors or social media garbage about the facts of the case is virtually impossible in this day and age.