Nope, you don’t get to rewrite history
https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1554
That 2022 study states
“Despite the large numbers of studies reviewed, the overall certainty of the conclusions remains low, with a very wide range reported for myocarditis incidence. That we are now more than a year and a half into mass mRNA vaccination and still do not have strong certainty about the incidence of this clinically important outcome is disappointing. Because these events are rare, making precise estimates is difficult.”
That is not saying it is a balanced risk, they are clearly saying they it rare at best, and the facts are it is far from rare. Those early studies were all propaganda lying to us all along. The sick fact is they had the data and refused to make it public.
The best they would admit was it was so low as to not be impactful, they did not present it as a balanced risk profile, literally they hid the real studies, hiding data is not how one presents it as a balanced risk.
“lingering“ ???
Is that what they call ‘doing our best to cover up’ now?
Skwor wrote: “Nope, you don’t get to rewrite history”
You’re the one trying to rewrite history. Even your own posted study refutes your claim that we were told there was zero connections.
Skwor wrote: “Nope, you don’t get to rewrite history”
You’re the one trying to rewrite history. Even your own posted study refutes your claim that we were told there was zero connections.
Your opposition to the vaccine blinds you to the fact that COVID-19 significantly increases the risk of stroke, particularly in the weeks following infection, with elevated risks potentially lasting for months or even up to three years. The virus triggers inflammation and blood clots, causing a 3–6 times higher stroke risk within the first week of diagnosis. Severe COVID-19 cases face the highest danger, often resulting in more fatal outcomes.