Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

The Constitution is silent on a state’s ability to secede so the Supreme Court essentially legislated from the bench in Texas v. White (1869) declaring secession illegal which avoided a Constitutional basis. So much for the sanctity of the Judicial Branch! So we are left with what Mao said, “ power comes from the end of a gun”.


45 posted on 04/12/2026 6:31:41 PM PDT by Rowdyone (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Rowdyone
The Constitution is silent on a state’s ability to secede so the Supreme Court essentially legislated from the bench in Texas v. White (1869) declaring secession illegal which avoided a Constitutional basis. So much for the sanctity of the Judicial Branch! So we are left with what Mao said, “ power comes from the end of a gun”.

As the Declaration of Independence clearly states that people have a right to abolish a government that does not suit their interests and form one that does, the burden of proof shifts to those who claim the constitution forbids it.

We don't have to show the constitution allows it, the opposition has to show the constitution prohibits it, and all the evidence I have seen on the topic indicates the framers believed states could leave if they so chose.

There is very little evidence to support the opposite claim. Mostly just two letters from Madison, written 40 years apart, and contradicting his own verbiage in Virginia's ratification statement.

54 posted on 04/13/2026 6:32:38 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson