Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RightOnTheBorder

The defense argued to keep the DNA out of the case over 20 years ago. Now that they have nothing to lose, they want the DNA tested. It’s a hail Mary move to delay execution. The DNA will match Duckett.

It’s a shame he wasn’t executed decades ago. The trial evidence was conclusive. Ducketts changing story to fit the evidence only confirmed his guilt. It’s a shame we allow the perp to delay execution in a case where the perp is clearly guilty.


8 posted on 04/01/2026 1:34:33 PM PDT by TheDon (Remember the J6 political prisoners! Remember Ashli Babbitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: TheDon

More info on the case:

https://youtu.be/ZpQt8uRBSDo


9 posted on 04/01/2026 1:37:10 PM PDT by TheDon (Remember the J6 political prisoners! Remember Ashli Babbitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TheDon

The story said the new DNA testing was inconclusive.

Perhaps it should be done by a different lab considering the advances in technology. I feel like “inconclusive” might indicate tampering with evidence to muddy the waters.


10 posted on 04/01/2026 2:30:33 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Yes, I did vote for this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson