That was before they became such an important voting bloc.
Would Trump be allowed to use these clips as an ad, and then end it with, “I’m Donald Trump and I approve this message”?
That’s BEFORE the Dems figured out the game, importing as many new voters as possible, giving them welfare, food stamps, housing, healthcare, everything under the sun and in return they own that voting block forever. Illegals are their slaves, they know if they step out of line Dems can easily just ship them all back at the drop of a hat
Never mind, they didn't. They actively pushed and and supported mass amnesty and didn't fix America.

Bkmk
The guy has a one minute clip of the words of democrats as they attack illegal immigration, that means we want to hear their words, but instead he plays loud music over them.
I don’t get some of these internet people.
Life-long Democrat David Schippers who worked for the Republican House Judiciary Committee during Clinton's impeachment investigated this. He believed if he'd been given more time to investigate it, he'd have had enough evidence to bring another charge against Clinton.
Injustice for All: An Excerpt from Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton's Impeachment
We need to limit the ability of Democrats to buy votes by placing middle-class tax caps in the federal constitution.
The high-income people have the Laffer Curve effect to protect them.
Fighting in Congress to send middle-class income and property taxation cap constitutional amendments to the states would make Congress turn deep red come 2027.
Let’s clearly understand history.
In the 1950s, 60s, 70s and 80s the majority of Republicans were pro-immigration. Illegal immigration was no big deal. We were opposed to Nazis, Communists, murderers, rapists... DUI drivers, Drunk n Disorderly immigrating. We had criteria.
The Democrats were anti-immigrant... mostly because the unions were anti-immigrant. But they were inconsistent. Polish Democrats in Chicago were pro immigrant for refugees from Communism. Chicago Democrat politicians were pro illegal immigrant for anyone who would pay the bribe.
In the late 1990s and up to 2001 Pat Buchanan was the lone Republican with visibility who was anti-immigrant...anti-illegal immigrant. Nationwide Sean Hannity would ridicule Pat Buchanan for his anti-illegal immigrant stance and parrot the open borders line of traditional Republicans.
In 2001 (or was it 2002) Sean Hannity in one radio program switched from open borders to anti-illegal immigrant with no explanation of why he switched. Sean started parroting the Pat Buchanan line. Increasingly in talk radio conservative hosts flipped from pro-immigrant to anti-illegal immigrant. Increasingly that was where the audience for their advertisers was. Their flip was no different than Tucker Carlson becoming the mouthpiece for where his money comes from.... except most of us ended up agreeing with the anti-immigrant rhetoric...and so far ... most of us abhor the Tucker Carlson rhetoric.
Tight enforcement of immigration is a BIG GOVERNMENT task. That is the #1 reason Republicans historically opposed tight enforcement. Prior to Nixon most immigration was enforced by local police at the local level. The role of the Federal government was mostly limited to the high profile Nazi who snuck into OHIO and had to be deported. In Chicago, it was the Chicago police who put the DUI driver and Drunk n Disorderly immigrant on a one-way charter train car or bus to Mexico...including sending non-Mexicans to Mexico. (Let the Mexicans deal with it.) Occasionally other IL towns would send some undesireable to the Chicago Bus. it was local police, local control.
Nixon centralized all that local control into BIG GOVERNMENT National control.
That is a brief and correct history during my lifetime. (It is obviously short and leaves out many anecdotes like Cesar Chavez was anti-illegal immigrant).
Why don’t the Goobers start making ads using this stuff?
EXCELLENT!!!
Thanks for posting this.