Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux
"body of sensor evidence from military and civilian systems, including radar tracks, infrared/FLIR footage, and multi-sensor corroborations"

Blurry photos and shaky videos.

"There is no publicly confirmed material evidence (direct evidence)–such as recovered craft, biologics, or exotic materials of non-human origin–that we know of."

No one has provide any physical evidence. We know this.

"whistleblowers claim the government possesses such material"

'Eye-witness testimony'. Claims without physical evidence and hearsay.

"It might be mass misperceptions, psychological phenomena, or expectation bias. It might be advanced human technology (classified or foreign). It might be something metaphysical or spiritual. It might be mass hysteria."

Word-salad mumbo-jumbo.

"The one thing we do know is that something is going on."

If something was going on we'd know it. Nothing is going on.

202 posted on 03/17/2026 5:31:38 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: yesthatjallen
You are the only person on these threads who claims to absolutely KNOW what is going and that it is nothing.

And then you mock the opinions of others who are merely guessing what it might be.

Your willful blindness and downright ugliness demonstrate intellectual dishonesty and immaturity.

203 posted on 03/17/2026 5:35:27 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
If, as you claim to know for sure, "nothing is going on" with UAPs, then why: These aren't fringe claims — they're statements from the sitting CIA Director, a sitting President, his Defense Secretary, and formal congressional proceedings. If it were truly "nothing," none of this official activity would be happening.
207 posted on 03/17/2026 6:49:10 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
No rebuttal to my comment to you, eh?

You are either naive and scared of the truth (which is OK), or you are a paid agent of disinformation, or you are just stupid.

Which is it?

222 posted on 03/17/2026 4:23:53 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Let's honestly test your hypotheses. Are you willing to lay out the evidence for your positions? Are you willing to defend them logically, empirically, and, most of all, honestly?

You may be right. Earn our respect by doing the work and not just sniping from the shadows.

Step up as a man.

223 posted on 03/17/2026 4:30:31 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson