Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steven W.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2026 Vol.517, Q Day 3,047Steven W. wrote:

my belief from the time was there was no “frazzledrip” ... not there wasn’t an insurance file, not that there isn’t any video, etc., but that the whole “frazzledrip” thing was just stuck into the narrative at the time, there was nothing to substantiate it, as I recall it was a purported filename that was blacked out or empty lined and people, at the time, were just guessing what “words” might fit in the available stuff and somebody guessed that and thus the “legend” was born ... the Clintons have historically been masters of this, I remember the purported cocaine on the oval office rug that was similarly dropped into the narrative here on FR back in the day. This is why HRC jumped on it IMO, she was handed the equivalent of a straw man that she could knock down with ease and IMO Boebert would have done better to ask something else that had something behind it

But, Hillary didn't 'jump on it.'

Hillary let her attorneys demand to take the discussion off record

Hillary's attorneys act scandalized and wronged, pointing the a prior decision by the chairman to keep that question away from the public (it's in the audio).

That response is actually the opposite of Hillary receiving a straw man argument she could knock down with ease.

The reason the lawyers angrily took the discussion off record was because there was something behind it, something horrific.

Q posted about Hillary's crimes against children multiple times, and posted the following drop 3 separate times (474545672365) in the Q drops for emphasis:

Many other drops point to Weiner's laptop and insurance files on Hillary e.g., 1552,the line "Weiner HRC/ Others - crimes against children." is followed by the one word line, "noose." The insurance file and Hillary's frazzledrip horror is pivotal blackmail her peers held over her.

Horowitz's report re Weiner also referenced "crimes against children." 
Even Comey's hand written mid-year review notes referenced  "crimes against children."

SDNY police were shattered viewing the content, and they were experienced in child abuse investigations. Yes, Hillary really is as bad as the rumors say she is, and likely far worse.

The public will never know the full extent of the atrocities involved. And so, many of us will 'get' to sleep more often at night than those patriots who sacrificed to investigate view this content.

 


334 posted on 03/02/2026 4:19:05 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

My thinking is always that’s the way the Clinton’s distract - they can’t deny any of the things in the list except the “frazzledrip” reference - the technique is to throw something into the mix that’s not true and then point at that and use that to deflect. Remember with Sick Willy everything was true then, too, except the “cocaine” part, and when Starr OIC dropped their report it was “oh yeah no biggy, see there wasn’t any cocaine, it was all made up”. It’s an effective technique and they’ve mastered it over the decades. Or they just suicide people ... WWG1WGA :)


339 posted on 03/02/2026 4:38:07 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
I'm so embarrassed ... I forgot to check IN!

a cat is walking across a table with a piece of paper on it .

Thank you, ransom.

347 posted on 03/02/2026 5:17:15 PM PST by John4.11 (Let your faith ROAR so loud that you can't hear what doubt is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.
a footnote from the horwitz report
No mention anywhere re: the contents of the laptop. Only generalities. We weren't ever going to find out. Case agent's lips were sealed to what he might have seen.

165
No electronic record exists of the case agent’s initial review of the Weiner laptop.

The case agent told us that at some point in mid-October 2016 the NYO ASAC instructed the case agent to wipe his work station.

The case agent explained that the ASAC was concerned about the presence of potentially classified information on the case agent’s work station, which was not authorized to process classified information.

The case agent told us that he followed the ASAC’s instructions, but that this request concerned him because the audit trail of his initial processing of the laptop would no longer be available.

The case agent clarified that none of the evidence on the Weiner laptop was impacted by this, explaining that the FBI retained the Weiner laptop and only the image that had been copied onto his work station was deleted.

The ASAC recalled that the case agent “worked through the security department to address the concern” of classified information on an unclassified system.
He told us that he did not recall how the issue was resolved.

357 posted on 03/02/2026 5:44:44 PM PST by stylin19a (Donate blood? NEVER AGAIN- Questions: Who's blood is it? Where'd you get it? Why's it in a bucket ? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson