[Penelope Dreadful]

Just look at how many people here, at Free Republic, who believe that it takes two citizen parents to be a Natural Born Citizen. Lunacy is everywhere. Look at all the Sovereign Citizens, too.

[MileHi]

Worst example you could have come up with.

[WhoisAlanGreenspan?]

"Just look at how many people here, at Free Republic, who believe that it takes two citizen parents to be a Natural Born Citizen. Lunacy is everywhere. Look at all the Sovereign Citizens, too." ~ Penelope Dreadful

I don't necessarily disagree that Lunacy is everywhere, but if that were true, why would Free Republic be 100% void of it?

From Brave browser AI answer to "Natural Born Citizen"
Constitutional Basis: The term appears in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution, which states that only a "natural born Citizen" (or a citizen at the time of the Constitution's adoption) can be President. The Constitution does not explicitly define the term, and the Supreme Court has not definitively ruled on its meaning.

I'd say there's room for a healthy debate without anyone needing to be called a lunatic.