How is the warm embrace of collectivism now?
Love the cognitive dissonance of being upset homeless died and then being upset he brings back what was saving homeless lives, all the while not really proposing a working solution to stop the homeless deaths without the sweeps.
These people are true idiots.
Cognitive dissonance, that’s the phrase I was trying to remember while reading the article. Normally in an argument there’s a thesis statement followed by statements supporting the thesis. Trying to figure out what the “homeless advocates” were thinking is mindboggling. When you boil it down you can’t treat homelessness because...uhm bringing the homeless inside so they don’t die is...violating their rights? Or, perhaps, if we don’t “treat” homelessness it goes away? Perhaps homelessness is a non-problem? I can’t construct a reasonable argument to support the “advocates” thinking. Logic and reasoning are not taught in schools.
DSA needs dead victims of capitalism. Not complicated.