Did you write that, or did you ask a computer to do it for you?
It is my compilation from previous posts of research I engaged in, with source attribution, as usual, versus simply stating my opinion.
So if you disagree with it, post research refuting it, not just an opinion.
As for AI, if I asked it (not all are equal: I find perplexity.ai and its Sonar model better than others I tried) to provide research on the the issues cited and posted its response - as I have often done on issue, with source attribution - then again it would be as valid as the sources cited (and would be far better formatted).
As one who researches things I have seen the decline of search engines, and the bias of Google in particular, and thus AI can be better for research, if sources are provided.
So again, if you disagree with what I posted, then post research refuting it, not just an opinion.