Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steely Tom
I wonder how they separated her pacemaker Bluetooth signal from all the others using the same channel.

Also, as far I know, the functional range of Bluetooth is less than 40 feet.

47 posted on 02/15/2026 7:11:54 AM PST by TangoLimaSierra (⭐⭐To the Left, the Truth is Right Wing Violence⭐⭐)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: TangoLimaSierra

“Also, as far I know, the functional range of Bluetooth is less than 40 feet.”

That only has to do with consumer grade electronics. A receiver and antenna designed to pick up weak signals could pick up Bluetooth many miles away.


48 posted on 02/15/2026 7:18:53 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: TangoLimaSierra

That’s for communication between two bluetooth devices, with low-power electronics (for long battery life) and a miniature antenna.

They were undoubtedly using a large antenna, perhaps several feet across, or an array of antennas. Also they were probably using military-grade receiver electronics that pull a lot of power from the helicopter’s electrical system. Together, those elements could be orders of magnitude more sensitive than an ordinary Bluetooth receiver.

But sensitivity means the noise gets amplified too; in this case, the “noise” includes other nearby Bluetooth devices; if they’re flying at altitude, “other nearby devices” could mean tens of thousands of others, at least in an urban or suburban environment. That’s what I’m having trouble understanding.


58 posted on 02/15/2026 8:05:12 AM PST by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson