Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

Pregnant patients?

Anyone else notice in this article, that they intentionally avoid saying that these are pregnant women?

As we know, we are not supposed to talk about pregnant women. Because there’s a rare biological female who identifies as male, because she is transgender, and we don’t want to offend her sensibilities. And such females can become pregnant even if they identify as male.

Just an observation, this article is a good example of how we are not allowed to make a common sense observation that it is women who become pregnant.


4 posted on 02/14/2026 1:31:02 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego; All

Oh yea sorry about that. This is a leftist site lamenting about how illegals can’t kill their babies in abortion because ICE is in town.

Please kindly over look her language and enjoy the fact abortions are now down 10% in that area.


6 posted on 02/14/2026 1:33:05 PM PST by Morgana ( “Abortion is the ultimate exploitation of women.” — Alice Paul 🇺🇸 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“ Pregnant patients?”

Also- they do like to qualify pregnancy as an illness. Pregnancy is the normal state of the uterus. In a spontaneous abortion- a miscarriage- the hormones regulate naturally

In a surgical or chemical abortion- birth control pill, and other abortifacients- the hormones are unnaturally interrupted leading to health problems. The mental and emotional effects are tremendous and won’t be studied until we get our culture straight


14 posted on 02/14/2026 1:57:47 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson