My issue with Tucker (and many podcast presenters) is they leave things too open-ended. We see the problems he discusses - but how exactly did they occur? how big are they really? Give us real facts, please.
Yes, the DOJ is corrupted and uncontrollable
certainly, Israel has outsize power over the US Government compared to other governments, whether for good or for ill
Yes, the GOP is rife with aggressive and self-promoting homosexuals
But instead of merely naming the issue and frightening us with all the possible evil effects - can we name names? give clear histories of development of the issue? outline actual structures of organization? Have guests promote policies to fix such problems?
His interviews remind me of the “search for Bigfoot” movies of the 1970s
“But instead of merely naming the issue and frightening us with all the possible evil effects - can we name names? give clear histories of development of the issue?”
You have to be kidding. They spend an hour to an hour and a half drilling down into that in detail. His interviews with Ian Carroll and Cenk Uygur are recent examples of that.