Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

I understand. The average is pushed up by a few with LOTS of assets.

I would argue that MOST people have under $500k in net worth. They are still carrying mortgages and car payments. They still rack up credit card debt. They live on nothing but meager SS.

They are gonna break hips and get cancer, like the rich folks.

They are going to cost the younger generations lots of money.

If most people have the greatest percentage of their net worth in their homes, they will erode that as millions of homes come onto the market.

It’s not going to be pretty. These people better make nice with their kids…because that’s where you are going to live for a while.


19 posted on 02/06/2026 4:42:05 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

That’s why the article highlighted the median around $350K. Median is always better for financial statistics.


37 posted on 02/06/2026 5:38:14 AM PST by Codeflier (Don't worry....be happy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt
They are going to cost the younger generations lots of money.

yet, the younger generations are salivating over all that inherited $$

59 posted on 02/06/2026 6:45:08 AM PST by goo goo g'joob (When honest people say what's true, calmly and without embarrassment, they become powerful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt
Absolutely. The average also includes the "wealthiest 1%", and that number is yuge, though with fewer people.

-PJ

83 posted on 02/06/2026 10:54:17 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson