Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

this has nothing to do g to do with the article but, speaking of ancient measurements, whenever I hear anyone mention a talent, i hear such a big range of weights. Anybody got a more specific definition? I know they didn’t have lasers and platinum weights standardized and such
1 posted on 02/01/2026 12:18:05 PM PST by MarlonRando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MarlonRando

Five talents equals one nephilim. Ha.


2 posted on 02/01/2026 12:20:16 PM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando
I don't know about talents, but the Egyptians had a sophisticated calibration system for cubits. There was an official national standard, and each construction supervisor had an official cubit stick that was calibrated to the national standard, with periodic updates (and penalty of death to the supervisor who failed to keep current with his calibration).

It's also worth noting that there were 2 cubits: a common cubit (18") and a royal cubit (21"). Other nations had their own cubit standards that were not calibrated to the Egyptian standard, and also had the common/royal distinction. So it's important in an article mentioning cubits to specify which cubit was in use.

4 posted on 02/01/2026 12:43:35 PM PST by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando
this has nothing to do g to do with the article but, speaking of ancient measurements, whenever I hear anyone mention a talent, i hear such a big range of weights. Anybody got a more specific definition?

You are correct that the descriptions we get widely vary. From what I understand, the definition of a talent depended upon the time and place it was being spoken of. From the Catholic Bible Dictionary:

TALENT An ancient unit of weight and value, normally that of metals such as silver and gold. The Hebrew talent (kikkar) was about 757 pounds or 35 kilograms (1 Kgs 9:14; 20:39).

The Greek talent (talanton) was also a large amount of money, but the unit varied greatly depending on the time, place, and metal (Matt 18:24; 25:15-18) 18:24; 25:15-18).

5 posted on 02/01/2026 12:49:36 PM PST by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando

Skeletal remains ?


8 posted on 02/01/2026 1:01:54 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando

They could used Measuring Man.

https://youtu.be/qeidRJF-d3o?si=QJ0ZbcvhlpJm89yl&t=52


10 posted on 02/01/2026 1:17:53 PM PST by wally_bert (I cannot be sure for certain, but in my personal opinion I am certain that I am not sure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando

They find bones of giants, the Smithsonian comes in, and you never see it again.


11 posted on 02/01/2026 1:37:18 PM PST by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando

They were metric cubits..,,


12 posted on 02/01/2026 1:48:23 PM PST by Organic Panic ('Was I molested. I think so' - Ashley Biden in response to her father joining her in the shower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando

I need to adjust my glasses. I read Epstein scroll. 🙄🤪

I will just leave this right here: There is a giant in Kandahar, Afghanistan. No one wants to talk about. It ate humans. Our military knows about it.


14 posted on 02/01/2026 1:52:04 PM PST by madison10 ("...the dark places of the earth are full of the haunts of cruelty." Psalm 74:20b [NKJV])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando

I used to have a good old book WORD KEYS WHICH UNLOCK SCRIPTURE. In it, the definition of a “giant” was “Mighty Men of Stature” or warriors considered the equivalent of “demi-gods” by the ancients.
You will find many of them in the Iliad.


19 posted on 02/01/2026 3:09:47 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (REOPEN THE MENTAL HOSPITALS CLOSED IN THE 1970s!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando

The Unseen Realm | Documentary


27 posted on 02/01/2026 4:57:20 PM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando
From the article: Long-lost Egyptian scroll...

They could have rolled out a blank scroll and traced the outline of one of the '4 to 5 cubit' tall individuals.



29 posted on 02/01/2026 5:30:52 PM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando

Sounds like a tall tale.


30 posted on 02/01/2026 5:31:19 PM PST by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando
A LOT of information about the giants of old...
Here are the Celts and Charlemagne with Roman accounts prominent regarding the Celts.
(see bottom of page to advance or go back)
35 posted on 02/02/2026 6:01:50 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarlonRando
Whether due to a disorder as 7-foot-7-inch Romanian basketball player Gheorghe Mureșan, and perhaps 7 ft 9 athlete Sun Mingming, or just by natural genetics as in7 ft 9 in Olivier Rioux, we can see that extraordinary exceptions to the norm can exist, and not necessarily be handicapped but be quite active.

perplexity.ai says:

Yes—those guys are great counter‑examples to any claim that extreme height is automatically non‑functional.

  • Gheorghe MureČ™an reached 7′7″ because of a pituitary disorder (gigantism/acromegaly), yet still played several seasons in the NBA and needed tumor treatment primarily for long‑term health risk, not because walking was impossible.scholar.lib.vt+2

  • Sun Mingming at 7′9″ likewise had acromegaly from a pituitary tumor, but after surgeries he was able to train for hours per day and play professional basketball, even if his size imposed extra strain and medical issues.latimes+2

  • Olivier Rioux, currently listed around 7′9″ and ~305 lb, was tall from early childhood and is playing high‑level organized basketball as a redshirted college center, which suggests at least some tall individuals can be highly active without obvious crippling disability.wikipedia+1

So: human biology clearly allows rare, functioning individuals close to 8 feet tall. That supports your main point: the fact that something is statistically extreme does not mean it is biologically impossible or necessarily non‑functional, and it leaves the door open—at least in principle—for a rare, very tall warrior or champion figure in antiquity.


39 posted on 02/02/2026 4:00:12 PM PST by daniel1212 (Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson