Democrat judges have invented a new legal concept, common law citizenship, to prevent illegal aliens from being deported.
https://www.americanexperiment.org/habeas-and-squatters-rights/
Excerpt:
.....The law is crystal clear, “shall be detained,” so judges bent on ignoring the law have to be ever more clever. Politico reports that two district-level judges within the 5th circuit (TX-LA-MS) have invented a new constitutional right which prevents ICE from,
detaining people who have established roots in the U.S. without due process. Those roots amount, in legal parlance, to a “liberty interest” that the Constitution says cannot be taken away without at least a hearing before a neutral judge.
I’m otherwise a big fan of “liberty,” but these judges have manufactured a squatter’s right to remain in America without permission. Keep in mind that detainees have already received all of the process to which they are due, that is, they have been ordered removed by an Immigration Court.
One district judge wrote,
The Court reiterates its original holding that noncitizens who have ‘established connections’ in the United States by virtue of living in the country for a substantial period acquire a liberty interest in being free from government detention without due process of law.
*******************
Just like ‘hate speech’ laws democrats inventing laws that don’t exist in an effort to justify their position, in other words not upholding the law as they should.
Infographic: Ring, Nest and the Invisible Surveillance State
Based upon research by Glenn Greenwald
****************************************
In February 2026, two ho-hum events laid bare America’s bloated corporate-state spy machine. Amazon’s Super Bowl plug for Ring’s “Search Party” turned neighborhood doorbells into an AI-powered dragnet, scanning and pinpointing targets like a Purge-style neighborhood watch. Then, FBI sleuths in the Nancy Guthrie case unearthed Google Nest footage that—per Google’s own rules—should’ve auto-deleted hours post-recording, sans subscription. Just one decade after Snowden’s “wake-up call,” the surveillance beast is fatter and nosier than ever—reform? Did someone say reform?
From the moment you step out of your front door, you enter a seamless web of surveillance no one consented to. Your departure is logged by your own Ring camera — now networked to your neighbors’ cameras through Amazon’s AI-powered Search Party system. Your license plate is captured at intersections by Flock Safety readers with ties to law enforcement. Your face is scanned at airports and on public streets by CBP and ICE facial recognition systems. Throughout the day, your phone, laptop, and connected devices feed behavioral data into cloud systems where companies like Palantir consolidate domestic records about you under expanding federal contracts. When you return home late at night, your neighbor’s Google Nest camera records your arrival — footage that Google stores on its servers even without a paid subscription, footage the FBI has demonstrated it can “recover” days later when it suits an investigation. And lurking beneath it all, AI systems are quietly assembling comprehensive personal dossiers from patterns the user never knowingly disclosed. This is not the future. This is today - a typical Friday in 2026.
America’s founding ethos—enshrined in the Fourth Amendment and Patrick Henry’s “liberty or death”—insisted that security never justifies surrendering our God-given rights. In 2026, that surrender is gleefully marketed in Super Bowl ads and free camera offers. Total surveillance now thrives not just in NSA bunkers, but in devices we mount on our own homes. Edward Snowden revealed state spying in 2013. A decade later, we’re erecting the rest ourselves—one camera, one AI, one opt-in at a time. The panopticon is here.
Will we see it before “privacy” becomes a an endangered species?
Above based on research from:
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/amazons-ring-and-googles-nest-unwittingly