This supposed inabilility to define man or woman, boy or girl, has got to be the greatest legal fiction ever conceived in the mind of demented lawyers.
Has the Supreme Court ever been asked to rule on a concept that cannot be defined?
Obviously, any definition at all would completely undercut their argument, which is why they refuse.
The lawyers should be charged with contempt of court.
And don’t forget the remedial class Supreme Court justice, Kentanji Brown, when she was asked as well -
“In the 13th hour of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s confirmation hearing Tuesday, Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., asked the Supreme Court nominee: “Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman’?”
Jackson, appearing confused, responded, “I’m not a biologist.”