Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212
Yes, citing ill-conceived and or mismanaged attempts while ignoring what has prevented both Soviet and not China hegemony will not achieve a different result than previous failure to justify isolationism.

Isolationism? Iran is very little threat to the citizens of this country. To the extent it is, it is only because Biden opened the borders and let Iranian sleeper cells in.

What you're advocating is George W. Bush's neocon policies on steroids. Bush wasn't even crazy to bomb Iran and think that it would result in a Western-friendly government emerging from the ashes.

13 posted on 01/14/2026 9:02:35 PM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Kazan
What you're advocating is George W. Bush's neocon policies on steroids

Again, citing some ill-conceived or poorly conducted campaigns, and or ignoring long term positive effects, does not support your isolationism. And you continue to evade answering my questions: What would the the world would look like if American was strict isolationists and withdrew all forces in the world, and what threats would it face (like China be controlling the S. China sea, take over Taiwan, the Philippines, while Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz, etc. and with Russia controlling Ukraine and more)?

16 posted on 01/15/2026 4:53:41 AM PST by daniel1212 (Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson