To: SunkenCiv
If NASA knew several years ago what it knows now, the heat shield would be designed differently. But they’re confident that flying the Artemis 2 heat shield on the revised profile is perfectly safe. During the first mission, Artemis 1, the vehicle descended from about 400,000 to 100,000 feet, and it was under a heat load of various levels for 14 minutes. With Artemis 2, this time it will be reduced to only 8 minutes.
Dumb question: If the reentry is steeper doesn't that cause more strain on the astronauts?
3 posted on
01/10/2026 6:33:20 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Yes, but for a shorter time.
4 posted on
01/10/2026 7:58:16 PM PST by
null and void
(To them, words are merely a means to deceive humans.)
To: BenLurkin
What concerns me is with the steeper angle of reentry the heat shield will endure even higher temperatures that the one with the damage. However, the damaged one was several minutes longer during the high temperature regimen. but at a lower temperature than a steep angle re-entry.
I sure as hell would not fly in either of them until a high angle reentry was done at the speeds of returning from the moon on a remotly piloted vehicle.
5 posted on
01/10/2026 8:03:16 PM PST by
cpdiii
(cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, MAGA)
To: BenLurkin
Just the sudden stop at the end. 🔥
6 posted on
01/10/2026 8:05:12 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
To: BenLurkin
Good grief they made heat shields thzt aorked in the 60s. Now we apparently aren’t sure we can.
8 posted on
01/10/2026 11:11:41 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson