Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
If NASA knew several years ago what it knows now, the heat shield would be designed differently. But they’re confident that flying the Artemis 2 heat shield on the revised profile is perfectly safe.

During the first mission, Artemis 1, the vehicle descended from about 400,000 to 100,000 feet, and it was under a heat load of various levels for 14 minutes. With Artemis 2, this time it will be reduced to only 8 minutes.

Dumb question: If the reentry is steeper doesn't that cause more strain on the astronauts?

3 posted on 01/10/2026 6:33:20 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

Yes, but for a shorter time.


4 posted on 01/10/2026 7:58:16 PM PST by null and void (To them, words are merely a means to deceive humans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

What concerns me is with the steeper angle of reentry the heat shield will endure even higher temperatures that the one with the damage. However, the damaged one was several minutes longer during the high temperature regimen. but at a lower temperature than a steep angle re-entry.

I sure as hell would not fly in either of them until a high angle reentry was done at the speeds of returning from the moon on a remotly piloted vehicle.


5 posted on 01/10/2026 8:03:16 PM PST by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Just the sudden stop at the end. 🔥


6 posted on 01/10/2026 8:05:12 PM PST by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Good grief they made heat shields thzt aorked in the 60s. Now we apparently aren’t sure we can.


8 posted on 01/10/2026 11:11:41 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson