Posted on 01/07/2026 10:50:06 AM PST by nickcarraway
Bayer's (BAYGn.DE), opens new tab Monsanto sued COVID-19 vaccine makers Pfizer (PFE.N), opens new tab, BioNTech (22UAy.DE), opens new tab and Moderna (MRNA.O), opens new tab in Delaware federal court on Tuesday for allegedly misusing its messenger RNA technology in manufacturing their vaccines, a Bayer spokesperson confirmed.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
The substance given to Americans was defined as "Gene Therapy" until the Government re-defined it by fiat, you lying sack of ...
Bayer - Monsanto have absolute proof the process used to make their DNA altering herb control farm/ranch products is the same mRNA technology used in the COVID shots, you lying sack of ...
No responsible person is "trying to change the definition of gene therapy to support their anti-vaccine narratives".
You COVID authoritarians certainly did Nazi the Bayer lawsuit coming, and you should have, you stole their technology.
Navy Patriot wrote: “The US CDC changed its definitions of “vaccine” and “vaccination” and keeps changing its definition of “fully vaccinated””
You need to do additional research instead of relying upon the anti-vaccine scare-mongers for your information:
AI Overview
Yes, the definition of “vaccine” was updated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in September 2021 to be more accurate and transparent, replacing the word “immunity” with “protection” or “immune response”.
Summary of Changes
The CDC altered the definitions of “vaccine” and “vaccination” on its website to reflect that no vaccine is 100% effective at preventing disease, which was a potential mis interpretation of the previous language.
The changes to the definitions of “vaccine” and “vaccination” on the CDC website involved replacing “immunity to” with “immune response against” and “protection against,” respectively.
Rationale and Context
The CDC stated that the updates aimed for greater transparency, acknowledging that no vaccine is 100% effective. Experts have indicated that the revised definitions reflect scientific advancements, including those related to mRNA vaccines. Merriam-Webster also made a similar change to its definition of “vaccine” for scientific accuracy. Other terminology changes by government health agencies have included shifting from “fully vaccinated” to “up to date” to incorporate booster doses. Vaccines continue to be a vital public health tool, preventing numerous infections, hospitalizations, and deaths.
End quote.
IOW, there was no nefarious intent in the definition change.
Navy Patriot wrote: “The substance given to Americans was defined as “Gene Therapy” until the Government re-defined it by fiat, you lying sack of ...”
Instead of calling names, your time would be better spent doing additional research instead of relying upon the anti-vaccine scare-mongers for your information:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has modified its definition of gene therapy over the years to adapt to technological advancements.
1993: The initial definition was broad, encompassing treatments aimed at modifying or manipulating genetic material or altering cell properties.
2018: The definition was refined to focus on products that work by the transcription or translation of transferred genetic material or by specifically altering human genetic sequences.
2020–2024: The FDA issued guidance to clarify how the 2018 definition applies to new technologies like genome editing.
Nothing there that supports your allegations. If you would do some more research you would learn that the mRNA COVID vaccine cannot alter your genes since it does not enter the cell nucleus where your DNA resides.
AI Overview
Yes, the definition of “vaccine” was updated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in September 2021
You need to do additional research...
No, you need to admit that what I said was exactly accurate.
Instead, you post disinformational propaganda designed to censor and suppress any unbiased investigation of highly unusual actions, instead of supporting an unbiased inquiry.
That's Nazi ethical thing to do.
Finally you spam the thread trying to force acceptance of indoctrination.
No.
Navy Patriot wrote: “No, you need to admit that what I said was exactly accurate.”
Navy Patriot wrote: “Instead, you post disinformational propaganda designed to censor and suppress any unbiased investigation of highly unusual actions, instead of supporting an unbiased inquiry. That’s Nazi ethical thing to do.”
No, what you posted was inaccurate disinformation and propaganda from anti-vaccine zealots. I posted an accurate description debunking your anti-vaccine propaganda.
Navy Patriot wrote: “Finally you spam the thread trying to force acceptance of indoctrination.”
Meanwhile you continue to spam the thread with anti-vaccine propaganda.
Pound Sand, Liar.
Navy Patriot wrote: “Pound Sand, Liar.”
You would rather call people names instead of posting real evidence instead of misleading anti-vaccine propaganda.
Continue Pounding Sand as Instructed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.