Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber; silent majority rising; logi_cal869; Karliner; GenXPolymath; Tell It Right
I am sure outfits like LCOE will never deliver or invite others to do life cycle cost analysis. Government rules and subsidies should subvert efforts to solve the problem.

In that regard, there is a lurking cost of hydropower. The dams accumulate silt behind their face. At some point, the ability to produce power must be reduced. The solution would be dredging operations of unheard of proportions.

49 posted on 12/15/2025 8:53:01 AM PST by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Retain Mike

Thanks for pointing out the silting problem of hydropower. I hadn’t considered that. Any ideas on the costs and frequency to do so? I imagine it’s case by case, so any ideas on the averages?


52 posted on 12/15/2025 9:18:17 AM PST by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Retain Mike

This is the thing grok did subtracting subsidies from the cost analysis. I stated subsidies are the cost because the money comes from the taxpayer/consumer.

I don’t understand most of the answers to my questions but on all questions the answer was wind turbines. I hope you or someone can ask the same questions and find the holes because no way wind turbines including offshore wind could be sustainable including the plans for California to be green by 2035


53 posted on 12/15/2025 9:21:46 AM PST by Karliner (Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson