Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

I could never understand lying about Senator Joseph McCarthy when the truth was so devastating. Like now the way to deal with the Democrats is to “weaponize” DOJ by directing it to impartially enforce the law.


45 posted on 12/15/2025 8:38:32 AM PST by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Retain Mike
Joseph McCarthy was an enemy of Communism. He should have been lionized in American history, not attacked and dismembered by it.

The Left were the ones primarily infiltrated by the Communists during that time frame. He exposed it, and they went to war on him, all the way up to Truman himself. Disgusting.

Most people don't know that about Truman.

I know this is long, but I think it provides some KEY context in two areas currently of concern to us: First, the machinations we see today on the part of the Left and how they relate to the current sets of Leftist scandals running the gamut from the Russiagate through the , and secondly, the obfuscation, behind the scenes manipulating, and outright lying on the part of the Left, and how it shows the Left of 2025 is the much the same in any ways to the Left of 1953. As it turns out, much more amenable to open violence. Sadly.

(NOTE: If this is too long to take the time and read or absorb, I won't be offended...:). I occasionally post things like this for anyone who shows an interest in it, so even an isolated piece of information can be very useful to you, if that is all you get out of it.)

Also, it both allows us to show both how McCarthy was unfairly demonized (he should be a celebrated American hero) and Truman was propagandized by the Left as an amazing Cold Warrior who fought Communism at every turn.

I hope you can take the time to read this somewhat long explanation to have some more context on McCarthy, Truman, and the Left in general. Hope this is interesting and helps. Much is taken from books I have read such as "Witness" and various books on Venona, but primarily from M. Stanton Evans in his landmark book . His viewpoint is interesting, because he is one of the few writers on events relating to McCarthy who was not only there and reporting at the time (albeit a cub reporter) and saw events with his own eyes, but did original research on the events, not simply regurgitating from what other people with a specific Leftist agenda have written and published.

I used to admire Truman, but his conduct with respect to the issue of Communists in the US government (State Department) in general and Joseph McCarthy in particular has prompted me to lose 90% of the respect I may have held for him.

There were two things in particular, that really disgusted me. (From the explanations provided by M. Stanton Evans in his landmark book ):


The lesser of those two things that bothered me were Truman's treatment of Harry Dexter White who in 1946, Truman appointed as the top American presence to the International Monetary Fund, which was a big deal at the time.

Harry Dexter White had been a top aide to the Treasury Secretary Morganthau, was a key figure in big global groundwork laying activities at the time, and was key to putting people in various posts in Treasury and other departments.

He was also a key spy in a Soviet spy ring, identified first to the FBI by Whittaker Chambers, later identified separately by Elizabeth Bentley to the FBI when she came clean, and lastly, by the Venona decrypts when the Cold War ended.

The entire matter came to light in 1953 when normal Americans wondered how someone like Harry Dexter White could have risen to the position he had held and it blew up into a political scandal complete with political hearings. Truman openly lied about how it happened.


The thing that DID bother me the MOST about Truman was his shameful behavior regarding the investigation by Senator McCarthy into the security risks at the State Department and the handling and access to the State Department Security Files.

As McCarthy knew (and was subsequently verified by Venona decrypts time and time again) the State Department in the 1930's through 1950 was riddled with Soviet agents. In his attempts to clean them up, he attempted to obtain access to the security files of State Department employees, which were both physically kept and maintained by the security team employed by the State Department itself.

Or so he and many others thought.

During the Senate Tydings Committee Hearings in the Summer of 1950 McCarthy and his committee requested delivery to them for their review the security files on specific employees at State (AS WAS BOTH THEIR JOB AND RIGHT TO DO, THAT RIGHT BOLSTERED BY A MANDATE FROM THE SENATE IN FULL TO DO) and they got a song and dance, first from Tydings, then from the Truman White House.


As you can see, I believe that Truman was far, FAR more interested in protecting the interests of the Democrat Party in general, and his administration's conduct in particular than it was in protecting the National Security of The United States. To him, it was preferable to have Soviet agents burrowed into the decision making apparatus of our national institutions such as the State Department and the Military (see the 1954 Army-McCarthy Hearings for more evidence of this truth). I have, over the years, come to see him as primarily a political hack similar to the majority of politicians we see today in the "deep state" which I have come to accept as well.
70 posted on 12/15/2025 12:31:05 PM PST by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson