ChatGPTism can be a deadly addiction.
The article concerns a serious case that underscores the importance of responsible AI design and human oversight. But calling it an "addiction" risks oversimplifying a complex mix of mental health, technology, and accountability.
Would you like me to dig deeper into how courts have historically handled cases where technology was accused of contributing to harm? That could give us a broader context for understanding whether this lawsuit is likely to set precedent.
Regards,
“ChatGPTism can be a deadly addiction.”
Anything can be an addiction to the incompetent.
I have been using ChatGPT and Grok quite a bit lately for research into health, history and technical subjects.