I see many posters here are among the usual suspects.
Any discussion about Candace Owens, her intentions and her credibility should be taken seriously, given her prominent role in this Information War.
Therefore, any accusation that she is lying, delusional or being pain by dark actors should come with concrete evidence. Also, listen carefully to her podcasts.
Feeling emotional about what Candace says is not the same thing as using concrete evidence and logic.
If you feel emotional, you can go to your nearest university campus and enter one of the so-called safe spaces there. Or you can suck your thumb.
But again, it doesn’t take a genius to see which posters are serious about a discussion and which posters are not.
I thinkbshe is demonic possessed. She shows the rotten fruit of it.who’s backing her: Satan.
Why are you postimg your crap to me?
And, dont post your crap to me.
Bill Clinton didn’t have an affair with Monica until the Blue Dress appeared.
This is the logic I don’t understand; Candace Owens can spend an entire podcast airing the wildest conspiracy theories imaginable, then people who either believe her or support her say in order to refute the conspiracies need concrete evidence, the irony is she offers no concrete evidence of her own to support the conspiracies she is exposing.
So do you really think the US military has a hand in Charlie Kirk’s assassination? Candace does.
“Therefore, any accusation that she is lying, delusional or being pain by dark actors should come with concrete evidence.”
The Macrons have offered plenty of solid evidence in court filings. Hasn’t stopped Candy.
Her ACCUSATIONS are all over the board. Mossad killed Charlie! The French killed Charlie! TPUSA killed Charlie! They ALL killed Charlie!
And it is obscene! She wants his actual killer - with tons of evidence, including a confession - to walk!
Since YOU watch Candy all the time, how about YOU explain who she REALLY thinks killed Charlie. And HER evidence.
Damn it, when someone confesses and is in jail awaiting trial, and YOU and the Candy Intel Agency insist it was someone else, YOU need to prove it. YOU need evidence. Not...”Charlie Kirk’s best friends saw him die and seconds later didn’t act the way I think they should have!”
“Any discussion about Candace Owens, her intentions and her credibility should be taken seriously, given her prominent role in this Information War.”
Really? She is claiming the wife of the President of France has a penis, and is a brother who killed his sister to take her place. HER CREDIBILITY???? YGBSM!
BTW - Did she ever find out how Kamalala’s father really is? Or did she stop getting enough clicks to continue THAT fantasy?
You are being tricked by Candace. She’s got no evidence for anything. She doesn’t debate when offered to on her own terms and she runs to all over the board cookery.
She’s a con.
Accusing Erika Kirk of the murder was all I needed.
Bottom line is Candace is a clicks craving clown, getting her dopamine highs and internet fames. Translating into a hefty income from all the tumult she creates. Some at the expense of MAGA unity.
The internet is rife with rumors that she is buying a house in Qatar next to Tucker Qatarlson’s. <<<< Example of the bs she creates.
Candace is splitting MAGA. Anyone who thinks that people other than Ro inson and his circle are guilty is nuts.