“But why would you accuse Charlie Kirk of implying Israel was involved?”
I never suggested that. Try reading. The texts Charlie Kirk wrote - if they meant he was turning on Israel, which he was not - would only be relevant if they provided a motive for Israel to murder him. WHICH IS A STUPID SCENARIO!
As I wrote: “Dammit we KNOW who killed Charlie. He was in court today.”
Nope. Not at all. UNLESS you are blaming Israel and the Jews when there is ZERO evidence pointing to them and a TON of evidence that his killer was a dude who was bonkers over another dude who wanted to be a woman: Tyler James Robinson.
There is a ton of evidence, including a confession:
“Robinson’s partner, with whom he shared an apartment, shared their text messages with police, according to charging documents released by Utah County officials.
On September 10, Robinson allegedly sent a message to his partner instructing them to “drop what you are doing, look under my keyboard.”
Under the suspect’s keyboard, his partner found a note reading, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it,” according to police, who said they found a photo of the note.
In subsequent messages to his partner, Robinson seemed to confirm he had shot Kirk and said he “had enough of his hatred.” He said he had planned the attack for over a week and discussed his plans to recover the rifle from where he left it.”
https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/29/us/tyler-robinson-charlie-kirk-court
Why do you think Charlie Kirk texted this:
“Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.”