Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber
“Law enforcement solves crime. O.K.? That is what they are supposed to do. They are supposed to solve crimes, not necessarily, um, prevent them from happening per se."

OK. I know she's an idiot.

But is she wrong? In practical terms:

Does "law enforcement" have any liability for failing to prevent crimes? Aside from certain politicians, does "law enforcement" have any obligation to protect anybody? What penalties, if any, does "law enforcement" face if it fails to intervene in an ongoing crime?

What does the Supreme Court say about this?

42 posted on 12/10/2025 7:43:27 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NorthMountain

The Supreme Court ruled your municipality has no obligation to you, whatsoever.


44 posted on 12/10/2025 7:49:22 AM PST by blackdog ((Z28.310) Leftists bring lies and chaos to a truth fight. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson